SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, SSRM scores 61 out of 100, a letter grade of C-, with a verdict of "Roarable Hold — Cautious Neutral." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 13/20 (ROIC 12%; FCF yield 4.19%), Whale 13F Flow at 6/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 17/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 11/20 (Beta 0.99; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 14/20 (Altman Z 2.71; Piotroski F 9/9; Debt/Equity 0.01).

For a prospective investor, the strongest pillar is insider conviction, which is a relative strength in the rating, while the weakest is whale 13F flow, where institutional support appears thin. The fundamental cash engine and balance sheet pillars sit in the middle of the range, supporting the view that the company is financially sound but not exceptionally priced for growth. The macro fit pillar, with a beta near 1.0, implies the stock tracks broad market movement rather than offering independent defensive or aggressive behavior. Valuation tradeoffs are visible in the market data: a trailing P/E of 14.6 and forward P/E of 12.3 suggest earnings are expected to improve, but the rating's cautious neutral verdict reflects that the upside case is not yet confirmed by broad institutional conviction. Upside drivers would include sustained free cash flow generation and a further strengthening of the balance sheet; the principal caution is that the rating itself does not signal strong conviction in either direction.

Per the market data, operating margin is 28.8%, net margin is 24.7%, and ROIC is 12%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.71 and the Piotroski F-Score is 9/9, with Debt/Equity at 0.01. Per the SEC financials, debt fell from $741.9M in FY 2023 to $51.4M in FY 2025, while cash rose to $515.6M in FY 2025. The FY 2024 period shows operating and net losses, so the profitability trend across the three reported periods is mixed before FY 2025.

Per the recent news and catalysts feed, the headlines include a stock report describing SSRM as undervalued after an expansion deal (YELLOW), a Seeking Alpha piece stating the transformation is not yet fully priced in (YELLOW), a Motley Fool note on a same-day share decline (RED, Risk Watch), a TradingView report on a share drop following a $464 Million Roxmore deal (RED, Risk Watch), a Yahoo Finance piece on undervaluation under a new Marigold mine plan (YELLOW), and a Business Wire announcement that third-quarter 2026 consolidated financial results will be released November 3, 2026 (YELLOW). Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals.

• What are the specific terms and financial impact of the $464 Million Roxmore deal referenced in the news feed?
• What does the Marigold mine plan change in the production and cost profile, and how is it reflected in forward estimates?
• What were the drivers of the swing from FY 2024 losses to FY 2025 net income of $395.8M?
• Why is the EPS field reported as N/A across all periods, and what is the reconciled per-share earnings history?
• What is the current analyst consensus, price target range, and institutional ownership breakdown, none of which is present in the source data?