Allison Transmission Holdings Inc. (ALSN) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ALSN scores 61 out of 100, a letter grade of C-, with a verdict of "Roarable Hold — Cautious Neutral." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine (16 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 21.3% and an FCF yield of 7.28%. These are the strongest inputs in the rating and point to efficient capital use and meaningful free cash generation relative to the market value.
• Whale 13F Flow (9 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, institutional accumulation and options positioning score in the lower-middle range. The source data does not include 13F holdings detail, so the drivers of this score cannot be verified here.
• Insider Conviction (17 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow is the highest-scoring pillar. The underlying transactions are not itemized in the source data.
• Macro Regime Fit (7 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, the beta of 0.98 and sector sensitivity score low. This suggests the stock's sensitivity to the broader market and its sector cycle is a meaningful constraint in the current rating framework.
• Forensic Balance Sheet (12 / 20): Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score of 2.61, Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, and Debt/Equity of 1.55 support a moderate score. Leverage is a visible tradeoff.

For a prospective investor, the rating describes a business with strong returns on capital and solid cash generation, offset by a macro-sensitivity profile and a leveraged balance sheet. The valuation (P/E TTM of 14.6, forward P/E of 13.6) is presented in the source as moderate relative to the company's cash generation, but whether that discount is attractive depends on how the forensic and macro pillars evolve. The rating is a structured summary of the source data, not a recommendation.

Allison Transmission Holdings Inc. is a NYSE-listed issuer classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector and the Auto Parts:O.E.M. industry, per the company profile. The source data does not itemize the company's products, customers, or revenue model beyond these classifications. Per the SEC financials, the company reported revenue of $3010.0M for FY 2025, indicating its operating scale. How the company makes money beyond this figure is not available in source data.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $3225.0M in FY 2024 to $3010.0M in FY 2025, and net income fell from $731.0M to $623.0M, while free cash flow held near $661.0M. Per the market data, the gross margin is 48.6%, operating margin 29.2%, and net margin 20.7%, with ROIC at 21.3%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.61 and the Piotroski F-Score is 6/9. Debt rose from $1168.8M in FY 2023 to $2885.0M in FY 2025, and the Debt/Equity ratio is 1.55, so the balance sheet has taken on more leverage over the reported periods.

The news wire contains six items, all related to ALSN, each flagged "RISK WATCH" with a RED light. Headlines include a Yahoo Finance piece asking whether auto-tire-truck stocks are lagging ALSN this year, a Seeking Alpha piece titled that the stock is "Too Cheap To Drive Past," a Benzinga five-year ownership return piece, a Simply Wall St forecast and analyst predictions piece, a Yahoo Finance piece on whether the options market is predicting a spike, and a MarketBeat piece reporting a move to "Strong-Buy" by Zacks Research. The summaries are generic and do not disclose underlying figures, so the content of each claim cannot be verified from the source data. The butterfly supply-chain graph reports no supply-chain links and no proprietary signals.

• What are the specific products, end markets, and customer concentration behind the $3010.0M FY 2025 revenue?
• Why did revenue and net income decline from FY 2024 to FY 2025, and what drove the increase in debt from $2395.0M to $2885.0M?
• The EPS field is N/A for all reported periods; what is the reconciled per-share earnings history?
• What are the consensus rating, price targets, and any 13F or insider transactions behind the RQD pillar scores?
• What sector and supply-chain dependencies explain the beta of 0.98 and the low macro-regime fit score?