ProFrac Holding Corp. (Class A) (ACDC) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ACDC carries an RQD score of 33 out of 100, a letter grade of E, and a verdict label of "Roarable Strong Sell — Forensic Risk / Avoid." The five pillars score as follows:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 7 / 20. Per the RQD pillar detail, this reflects ROIC of -11.4% and an FCF yield of 2.22%. For an investor, the cash engine is currently generating negative returns on invested capital, with only a modest free-cash yield offsetting that weakness.
• Whale 13F Flow: 9 / 20. Per the RQD pillar detail, this reflects institutional accumulation and options positioning. The source does not provide 13F holder detail, so the score cannot be traced to specific holders.
• Insider Conviction: 5 / 20. Per the RQD pillar detail, this reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The holder records in the source are empty, so the underlying trades cannot be independently verified here.
• Macro Regime Fit: 7 / 20. Per the RQD pillar detail, this reflects a beta of 1.0 and sector sensitivity. A beta of 1.0 implies market-like volatility, while the sector-sensitivity component pulls the score down.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 5 / 20. Per the RQD pillar detail, this reflects an Altman Z-Score of 0.39, a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, and a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.22. These are the weakest readings in the set and point to elevated distress and financial-quality risk.

Taken together, the rating frames ACDC as a high-risk, forensically weak name. The upside case rests mainly on the free-cash yield and institutional interest, while the downside case is driven by negative returns, weak solvency signals, and a low insider-conviction score. A prospective investor should weigh the RQD grade as a risk-screening signal rather than a forecast, and should note that the balance-sheet pillar is the most punitive component.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $2630.0M in FY 2023 to $1941.8M in FY 2025, and operating income moved from $166.6M to $-225.8M over the same span. Per the market data, the operating margin is -11.6%, the net margin is -18.3%, and the gross margin is 0%. Per the RQD pillar detail, the Altman Z-Score is 0.39 and the Piotroski F-Score is 3/9, both consistent with financial stress. The balance sheet shows $22.9M of cash against $875.6M of debt in FY 2025, and the RQD pillar detail lists a Debt/Equity ratio of 1.22.

The news wire contains six items tied to ACDC. The most prominent risk item is a Yahoo Finance piece titled "3 Reasons ACDC is Risky and 1 Stock to Buy Instead," flagged RED with a RISK WATCH label. A Stock Titan item flagged YELLOW states that third-quarter results are due before a call on Nov. 5 at 8:30 a.m. ET, which is a scheduled near-term catalyst. Several Yahoo Finance and MarketBeat items flagged YELLOW carry MARKET WIRE labels and cover earnings comparisons and price action, including a stock price up 8.2% headline. One item flagged GREEN with a CATALYST label reports the stock climbing 3.71% to $4.75 as buyers reclaimed short-term momentum. The butterfly supply-chain graph reports no supply-chain links and no proprietary signals.

• What are the specific drivers of the FY 2025 operating loss, and how much reflects one-time items versus structural pressure? The source reports the figures without decomposition.
• What are the EPS, P/E, and EV/EBITDA values, which are absent from the source and prevent standard valuation comparison?
• Does the scheduled Q3 results release on Nov. 5 change the trajectory of revenue, operating income, and debt, given the trend in the reported periods?
• What debt maturities, covenants, and liquidity sources sit behind the $875.6M debt load against $22.9M of cash?
• Who are the institutional holders and insiders behind the RQD whale and insider pillar scores, since the holder records are empty?