Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. (HOS) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, HOS scores 47 out of 100 with a letter grade of D, labeled "Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning." The five pillar scores are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 10 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this reflects ROIC of 3.5% and an FCF yield of 8.57%. For an investor, a 3.5% ROIC is modest relative to the capital base, though the 8.57% FCF yield indicates the cash generated per dollar of market value is comparatively substantial. The gap between these two readings is itself informative: cash generation is present, but returns on invested capital are thin.
• Whale 13F Flow: 4 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this is the weakest pillar, described as institutional accumulation and options positioning. The source data contains no 13F holder detail (see Analyst View section), so the low score is a signal of weak institutional support rather than a detailed ownership map.
• Insider Conviction: 12 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. The source data does not itemize these transactions, so the investor cannot verify direction or size from this dossier.
• Macro Regime Fit: 12 / 20. Per the RQD rating, beta is 1.0 with a sector sensitivity assessment. A beta of 1.0 means the stock is expected to move in line with the broader market, offering no defensive cushion; the oilfield services sensitivity adds cyclical exposure.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 9 / 20. Per the RQD rating, Altman Z is 1.95, Piotroski F is 6/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.19. Debt/Equity of 0.19 is a relative strength, while an Altman Z of 1.95 sits in a zone that conventionally warrants caution about financial distress, and the Piotroski score is moderate.

Implications for a prospective investor: The upside case rests on the FCF yield and low leverage, which give the equity cash-generation support and balance-sheet room. The valuation tradeoff is significant: per the market data, P/E (TTM) is 51.7 against EPS (TTM) of 0.14, and EV/EBITDA is 22.6, which prices in substantial earnings recovery relative to reported trailing profitability. Weak whale flow and mixed insider signals reduce confidence that informed capital sees the recovery. The overall RQD verdict is a distribution warning, so the rating frames this as a name where the risk-reward appears unfavorable on the current scoring.

Hornbeck Offshore Services Inc. (HOS) is a NYSE-listed issuer in the Energy sector, operating in the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry, per the company profile. Per the market data, the company's margin profile shows gross margin of 12.3%, operating margin of 5%, and net margin of 2.4%. The source data does not provide a breakdown of its customers, service lines, or revenue mix. Its market capitalization is $1.6B per the market data.

Per the recent news feed, the six items are all tagged to HOS:

• Momentum and market action (YELLOW): Coverage notes a stock rise tied to momentum returning to offshore services and a forecast-style report on market action.
• Valuation framing (YELLOW): A Simply Wall St report frames the shares as potentially well below fair value following a 31% slide, a view that conflicts with the RQD distribution warning and should be weighed against it.
• Rating upgrade (GREEN, CATALYST): A MarketBeat item reports a Wall Street Zen rating raised to "Buy," the only item in the feed tagged as a catalyst.
• Earnings timing (YELLOW): Stock Titan reports that third-quarter results will be released before the Nov. 5 call, a near-term event risk.
• Fleet and technology expansion (YELLOW): A NOLA.com report describes an "all-in-one" offshore services firm with a expanding fleet and frontier technology, which is a growth narrative to verify against reported financials.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals.

• What drives the gap between trailing EPS of 0.14 and a P/E of 51.7, and what portion of recent net income decline reflects cyclical versus structural factors?
• Why are EPS values for FY 2023–FY 2025 unreported, and how do reported net income figures reconcile to per-share results?
• What are the Congressional PTR and SEC Form 4 transactions that make up the insider cluster flow scored in the RQD rating?
• What is the reported cash and debt position for FY 2023, given those fields are missing from the financials?
• Which specific fleet expansion and frontier-technology initiatives are referenced in the news, and what capital commitments do they require?