TIC Solutions Inc. (TIC) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, TIC carries an RQD Score of 48 out of 100, a letter grade of D, and the verdict label "Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 8/20 (ROIC -0.4%; FCF yield 2.7%), Whale 13F Flow at 15/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 7/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 10/20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 8/20 (Altman Z 1.08; Piotroski F 6/9; Debt/Equity 0.73).

For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the rating's weakest elements are the fundamental cash engine and the balance sheet, each scoring 8 of 20. The cash-flow yield of 2.7% sits against a negative ROIC of -0.4%, meaning the company is not currently generating returns above its cost of capital on the figures provided. The Altman Z of 1.08 is a low reading, and the Debt/Equity of 0.73 combined with a debt balance of $1587.7M against cash of $439.5M (per the SEC financials, FY 2025) frames the leverage question. The strongest pillar is institutional flow at 15 of 20, which reflects accumulation and options positioning in the source data; this is a potential upside driver, but it does not by itself offset weak cash generation and a weak balance sheet. Insider conviction at 7 of 20 and macro fit at 10 of 20 are both below midpoint. The valuation tradeoff is that the source data does not supply P/E or EV/EBITDA, so the market's price relative to earnings cannot be assessed from these inputs. The 52-week range of $6.36 - $12.48 against a price of $10.39 places the stock in the upper portion of its recent range, which a prospective investor should weigh against the rating's distribution warning.

Per the market data, gross margin is 29.4%, operating margin is -1.1%, and net margin is -5.7%. ROIC is -0.4%. Per the Roarable RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 1.08 and the Piotroski F-Score is 6/9, with Debt/Equity at 0.73. The FY 2024 revenue and net income figures are reported as $0.0M in the source, which the source data does not explain. Not available in source data for the reasons behind the reported figures.

Per the recent news and catalysts feed, six items relate to TIC: a market-wire item on the third-quarter 2026 earnings release date (YELLOW), a market-wire item on options chain quotes (YELLOW), a Simply Wall St forecast item (YELLOW), a MarketBeat item reporting a 6.8% share price jump framed as a potential buy (GREEN, catalyst), a TradingView estimates item (YELLOW), and a MarketBeat item reporting heavy call option buying (YELLOW). The earnings-date confirmation is the clearest scheduled catalyst. The call-option activity and the 6.8% jump are the only items tagged as catalysts or positive-signal items. The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph reports no supply chain and no butterfly links, and no proprietary signals. Risk watch: the feed contains no specific negative fundamental news; the rating's distribution warning is the principal risk signal in the source.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is listed as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. The graph therefore provides no upstream or downstream dependency mapping, no sector correlation data, and no identified 2nd-order bottlenecks. A prospective investor should note that the source contains no basis for assessing ripple effects through suppliers or customers. Not available in source data for upstream dependencies, downstream dependencies, or sector correlations.

• What drives the reported $0.0M revenue and net income in FY 2024 when FY 2023 and FY 2025 show revenue, and is that a reporting gap or an economic event?
• What are the company's products, customers, and revenue model, given that the source provides only a sector and industry classification?
• What is the debt maturity profile and cost of debt behind the $1587.7M debt figure against $439.5M cash?
• What are TIC's P/E, EV/EBITDA, and EPS on a trailing basis, since these are absent from the source data?
• What do the reported institutional and options flows represent in terms of identifiable holders and trade sizes?