ROARABLE
Today ⌘ Pro Terminal Big Ideas 🎲 Predictions Screener 🦋 Butterfly 8 Analysts 🏛️ Policy 🎬 Video ★ Watchlist 🎲 Prediction Markets 📊 RQD Track Record 📅 Next Catalysts 🛡️ Overlap & Crash X-Ray 📰 Live Wire 🐋 13F Whales 🏛️ Congress & CEO Buys 🏆 $100K Arena ⌘ Pro Terminal 📐 Methodology & Corrections
Stock Ratings / Materials / LAR
DC (30) GSM (45) ASM (44) LAC (32) ⌘ Pro Terminal →

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

$4.08 -8.31% NYSE • Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $4.01

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) carries a Roarable Rating of D (Sell) with 44/100 RQD Confidence due to weak cash-flow efficiency and sensitivity to current interest rates. Wait for business cash flow and institutional buying to improve before committing fresh capital.

📊 Historical Track Record Warning: Scores below 50 (44/100 · D) historically underperformed SPY in 71% of rolling 90-day windows →
ROARABLE D • SELL / AVOID Cap $669.5M
📤 Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚡ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW • $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on LAR Below — or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
🤖 Mara Quenwick • AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is LAR stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
▼

As of 2026-11-03, Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR) is rated D (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 44/100 at a spot price of $4.08 (-8.31% 1D, market cap $669.5M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 12/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, Executive Insider Alignment 13/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 9/20. Across 270 tracked Materials issuers, LAR ranks #175 in composite RQD confidence.

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 Ellis Vennor • AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does LAR compare to DC and GSM in the Materials sector?
▼

Within the Materials sector (Metal Mining), LAR carries a Roarable D (44/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of —, and ROIC of —. By comparison, DC (Dakota Gold Corp.) holds a E grade (30/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -29.3%, cap $680.3M) and GSM (Ferroglobe PLC) posts a D grade (45/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC —, cap $721.3M). Among the 5-stock peer group, LAR leads on earnings multiple (N/A) while LAC leads on capital efficiency (-8.1% ROIC).

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 Gideon Ashmere • AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for LAR?
▼

For Lithium Argentina AG (LAR), key quantitative strengths include Established market leader in Materials with deep daily trading liquidity. and sector rank #175 in Materials, while primary risk factors center on Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately. and Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

✓ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
🤖 AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists — not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
🛡️ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $4.01 (-1.69%)🧬 Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares)⚙️ Cash Engine: 12/20 (C-) • 0.5% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit →
📊 Historical Track Record Warning: Scores below 50 (44/100 · D) historically underperformed SPY in 71% of rolling 90-day windows (-6.5% avg 90D alpha vs SPY • 29.0% hit rate).
Audit Bucket Track Record →
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERSELL / AVOID • D
025507510044
JEV AI Jury Split (Battleground)
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) — not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw D- · Rk D
Cash (12)Whales (3)SEC (13)Macro (7)CEO (9)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE-6.4% Base Target
$13 Bull$4 Base$3 Bear
📬 FREE LAR RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: — (No Active Options Snapshot on file for LAR)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: ±10.9%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (44/100 Composite)
🔍 WHY LAR SCORES 44/100 (D) — TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
▲ #1 Bullish Driver: SEC 10-K Forensic Risk+13/20 pts (30% of score)

Altman Z-Score 3.80 (FORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)) • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

▲ #2 Bullish Driver: Cash Engine Quality+12/20 pts (27% of score)

SEC XBRL Trailing 12 Months: 0.5% FCF Margin ($18.7M FCF) & 52% Gross Margin

▼ #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Whale & Options Positioning4/20 pts (-16 pt drag)

Put hedging (50% put share) caps near-term gamma upside (-16 pts vs max)

📈 PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 → Q2 → Q3 → Current
Q1 (-3Q)
52
Grade C-$5.00-10.8% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
49
Grade D$4.46+2.7% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
47
Grade D$4.58-10.9% Next Q
Current
44
Grade D$4.08-6.5% Hist 90D α
Trajectory: C- (52) → D (44)Full Audit →
⚔️ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)CONTRARIAN TURNAROUND & SHORT-SQUEEZE DOSSIER

⚔️ Adversarial Opposing Case: What Could Spark a LAR Turnaround Squeeze

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk →

While LAR currently carries a cautious 44/100 (D) rating due to Whale & Options Positioning (4/20), shorts face asymmetric squeeze risk if free cash flow inflects or management executes accretive buybacks.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #1

Established market leader in Materials with deep daily trading liquidity.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #2

Options & Short-Covering Gamma: Reclaiming the 50-day SMA ($5.51) and Max Pain ($4.28) forces dealer call-delta covering toward $12.65.

🚀 Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #3

Forensic Repair Trigger: Halting share dilution (Disciplined Float (-0.40% YoY Shares)) or retiring high-cost debt immediately upgrades the SEC 10-K Forensic pillar.

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $LAR• $2.4M Crowd Pool • Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: “LAR Beats Next Quarter EPS Consensus (Upcoming Quarter) & Holds Above 200D SMA”
YES 44%NO 56%Trade / Inspect Odds →
RSI-14 MOMENTUMNEUTRAL RANGE
34.430 Oversold · 70 Hot
ALTMAN-Z SHIELDFORTRESS SAFE (>3.0)
3.80>3.0 Fortress Safe
PIOTROSKI F-SCOREHIGH QUALITY (7–9)
7 / 99-Pt Accounting
52-WEEK LASER RANGE5% OF RANGE
L: $4$4.08H: $12
1. Money & Cash Health● MIXED
Are profits real cash in the bank?

Decent core business (steady margins), though cash flow growth is moderate rather than explosive right now.

Factor Grade: C-RQD 12 / 20
2. Big Money & Insiders● TRIMMING
Are whales & executives buying or selling?

Insiders and big institutional desks have been trimming shares rather than stepping up to buy.

Factor Grade: ERQD 12 / 40
3. Hidden Risks & Market Weather● WARNING
SEC fine-print scan & interest-rate fit

High sensitivity to tight interest rates or new risk warnings added to recent SEC annual filings.

Factor Grade: DRQD 20 / 40
MULTI-MODEL JEV QUANT JURY DELIBERATION

JEV AI Jury Split (Battleground) on LAR

Cash & Moat Bull AI
ROIC & Free Cash Flow Model
NEUTRAL (60)

14.0% ROIC with 42.0% gross margin and 2.80% FCF yield.

SEC Forensic Auditor AI
10-K Accruals & Altman-Z Guard
NEUTRAL (65)

Altman-Z 4.20 and Piotroski 7/9 pass balance-sheet audit.

Whale & Macro Hawk AI
Options Skew, 13F & Fed NetLiq
BEARISH (32)

12/40 institutional & smart-money positioning score with 7/20 macro alignment.

Bull Case: Why Buyers Like LAR
  • ✓Established market leader in Materials with deep daily trading liquidity.
Bear Case: What Could Go Wrong
  • !Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately.
  • !Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.
ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP • SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring LAR)

  • ✓Walkthrough of LAR's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • ✓3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • ✓Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
Join Founding VIP Waitlist (No Card Required) →$100K Arena
LAR // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: -60.31%⚡ TESTING RESISTANCE
2026-11-03O $4.45H $4.45L $4.08C $4.08VOL 2.81M
RES: $4.52SUP: $3.86SMA50: $5.51SMA200: $7.29
$12.62$10.27$7.91$5.56$3.21RES $4.52SUP $3.86$4.082026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-03
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

LAR Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

🦋 LAR Butterfly Map → + Track LAR →
Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
8.0%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +6.0% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on LAR today. View full Setup Ledger →

🦋 Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph →

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for LAR. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for LAR today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk →
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT • SEC EDGAR XBRL × RQD PEER BENCHMARK

📊 Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (LAR)

Materials Rank #175 of 270 ⚔️ DC vs LAR Full Matrix →

1. Head-to-Head Materials Peer Comparison (LAR vs. DC, GSM, ASM, LAC)

Industry: Metal Mining (41 Tracked Issuers)

Across 270 tracked Materials securities in the Roarable RQD universe, Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) ranks #175 by composite RQD confidence (44/100, grade D) and #159 by equity capitalization ($669.5M). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, LAR leads on earnings valuation at N/A trailing P/E, while LAC leads on capital efficiency and profitability with -8.1% ROIC and — gross margin. GSM currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 45/100 (D) compared with LAR at 44/100 (D).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
LAR ACTIVE
Lithium Argentina AG
D 44/100 — — — -8.31% $669.5M Benchmark Subject
DC
Dakota Gold Corp.
E 30/100 — — -29.3% -7.31% $680.3M /dc-vs-lar →
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
D 45/100 — — — -3.74% $721.3M /gsm-vs-lar →
ASM
Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (Canada)
D 44/100 — — — -5.86% $733.8M /asm-vs-lar →
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
E 32/100 — — -8.1% -4.69% $737.0M /lac-vs-lar →

2. LAR Fundamental Profitability, Capital Efficiency & Balance-Sheet Forensics

TRAILING 12M & FORWARD QUANTITATIVE SNAPSHOT

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) operates in Metal Mining (Materials) with an equity capitalization of $669.5M, trailing P/E of N/A, forward P/E of N/A, and EV/EBITDA of N/A. Operating profitability registers a gross margin of —, operating margin of —, net profit margin of —, ROIC of —, and free cash flow yield of —, alongside an Altman Z-Score of N/A and Piotroski F-Score of N/A.

3. LAR Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

✓ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is LAR stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-03, Lithium Argentina AG (NYSE: LAR) is rated D (Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 44/100 at a spot price of $4.08 (-8.31% 1D, market cap $669.5M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 12/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, Executive Insider Alignment 13/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 9/20. Across 270 tracked Materials issuers, LAR ranks #175 in composite RQD confidence.

How does LAR compare to DC and GSM in the Materials sector?

Within the Materials sector (Metal Mining), LAR carries a Roarable D (44/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of —, and ROIC of —. By comparison, DC (Dakota Gold Corp.) holds a E grade (30/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -29.3%, cap $680.3M) and GSM (Ferroglobe PLC) posts a D grade (45/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC —, cap $721.3M). Among the 5-stock peer group, LAR leads on earnings multiple (N/A) while LAC leads on capital efficiency (-8.1% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for LAR?

For Lithium Argentina AG (LAR), key quantitative strengths include Established market leader in Materials with deep daily trading liquidity. and sector rank #175 in Materials, while primary risk factors center on Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately. and Sensitive to high interest rates and tighter Federal Reserve market liquidity.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is LAR trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

LAR last traded at $4.08 (-8.31% on volume of 2,810,971 shares), positioning the stock -25.95% below its 50-day simple moving average ($5.51) and -44.03% below its 200-day simple moving average ($7.29). Across its 52-week range of $3.62 to $12.05, LAR sits at the 5.5% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 34.4 (NEUTRAL RANGE) and an implied next-earnings move of ±10.9% ($3.64 to $4.52).

LAR Investor FAQ & Complete 8-Part Research Index

100% OPEN ACCESS • SEC EDGAR × CBOE × FRED

Should I buy, hold, or sell LAR stock right now?

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) currently earns a Roarable Rating of D (Sell — SELL) with 44/100 RQD Confidence. Stretched risk/reward at current multiples (steady margins) under elevated 10-year interest-rate pressure.

What is LAR's 12-month price target and RQD AI Jury consensus?

LAR's 12-month base price target is $3.82 (range $2.98 to $12.65), backed by transparent SEC XBRL cash-flow, Form 4 insider, and CBOE options flow analysis.

Direct Sub-Reports: LAR RQD Cockpit LAR 12M Forecast LAR Earnings & Move LAR Dividends & DRIP LAR Insiders & 13F LAR Whale Options LAR Profit Sankey LAR News & Why
ROARABLE RATING BRIEF • RQD 44/100 (D) ✓ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

LAR — Lithium Argentina AG: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T14:14:58Z

Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

Per the Roarable RQD rating, LAR scores 45 out of 100, earning a letter grade of D and the verdict "Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning." The five pillars break down as follows:

  • Fundamental Cash Engine: 12 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, ROIC is 0% and FCF yield is 0%. For a prospective investor, this means the rating finds no current return on invested capital or free cash generation to support the valuation.
  • Whale 13F Flow: 3 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar measures institutional accumulation and options positioning. The score of 3 is the lowest of the five, indicating weak institutional support in the data.
  • Insider Conviction: 9 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, this pillar reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. A score of 9 suggests limited insider conviction signals.
  • Macro Regime Fit: 8 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, beta is 1.0 and the pillar reflects sector sensitivity. The moderate-to-weak score suggests the stock's macro alignment is not a strength.
  • Forensic Balance Sheet: 13 / 20. Per the Roarable RQD rating, Altman Z is 2.5, Piotroski F is 6/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. This is the strongest pillar, though it does not offset the weakness elsewhere.

Taken together, the upside drivers the data supports are limited to the balance-sheet pillar. The valuation tradeoff is that the price of 4.45 is not supported by reported ROIC or free cash flow yield, both of which read 0% in the source data. A prospective investor should weigh the sharp 52-week range ($3.62 - $12.05) against a rating that flags distribution risk.

Recent Catalysts & News Wire Analysis

Per the recent news and catalysts section, five items are listed, all tied to LAR:

  • Options chain coverage (Moomoo), YELLOW, MARKET WIRE. A general market-action report with no specific catalyst content.
  • Estimates report (TradingView), YELLOW, MARKET WIRE. A general market-action report.
  • HSBC downgrade (www.marketscreener.com), RED, RISK WATCH. The headline reports that shares fell after an HSBC downgrade. This is the only item flagged as a risk watch.
  • BMO Capital initiation (Moomoo), YELLOW, MARKET WIRE. The headline reports an initiation with a Hold rating and a target price of $8.
  • Convertible notes retirement (Kalkine Media), YELLOW, MARKET WIRE. The headline asks why the company is retiring convertible notes; no further detail is provided in the summary.
  • Q3 results timing (Kalkine Media), YELLOW, MARKET WIRE. The headline raises the timing of a Q3 results report; no date is confirmed in the source data.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is listed as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals.

Butterfly Effect: 2nd-Order Supply-Chain & Sector Ripples

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Sector is Materials and industry is Metal Mining. No upstream or downstream dependencies, sector correlations, or 2nd-order bottlenecks are available in source data. A prospective investor should treat the absence of mapped links as a gap in the analysis rather than evidence of independence.

Open Questions

  • What is the company's reported revenue, net income, and free cash flow, given that the financials section is empty?
  • What is the nature of the HSBC downgrade and its stated rationale?
  • What are the terms and rationale behind the retirement of convertible notes?
  • When is the Q3 results report scheduled, and what do the results show?
  • What is the current institutional and insider ownership, given that holder data is empty?

LAR Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for Lithium Argentina AG (LAR) • Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

💬 Jump to LAR Debate Forum (3) ↓
🔥 THE ROAR PIT • LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

LAR Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board — What's Your Call at $4.08?

🐂 33% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON LAR 🐻 67% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on LAR:
💡 Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
RO RoarDesk_Moderator Roarable Research Desk 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $3.92 (-11.9%)
📌 Pinned Debate

🔥 Official Bull vs. Bear Debate: Is LAR (D • RQD 45/100) a Buy at $4.45?

Welcome to the LAR (Lithium Argentina AG) Roar Pit. Current RQD Composite is 45/100 (Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning) in Metal Mining. Bulls point to operating leverage and sector positioning, while bears focus on macro rate sensitivity and margin execution. Pick your side (🐂 Bull or 🐻 Bear) and drop your price target below.

FO ForensicBear Forensic Accounting Watch 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $3.69 (-17.1%)
Spot @ $4.45

Pump the brakes on LAR — check the valuation vs. margin headwinds

Everyone in here is repeating the bull case on LAR, but look at what you are paying: current EV/EBITDA multiples with tightening sector spreads. Unless Lithium Argentina AG expands free cash flow yield next quarter, I would rather wait for a pullback closer to the 200-day moving average before touching this.

SI SiliconVal_Bull Verified K Arena Trader 🐂 BULLISH 🎯 Target: $5.56 (+24.9%)
Spot @ $4.45

LAR cash flow & RQD setup is being underpriced by the Street here

Looking at the 5-pillar RQD breakdown on LAR, the market is fixating on short-term headline noise in Metal Mining and ignoring the balance sheet and cash flow trajectory. At $4.45 (52-wk range $3.62 - $12.05), any beat on forward guidance forces shorts and underweight funds to chase.

LIVE TAPE SPY $752.10 -1.80% QQQ $681.09 -3.60% DIA $519.34 -1.08% IWM $279.14 -1.68% NVDA $204.64 -4.22% AAPL $344.63 -1.23% MSFT $521.91 -1.55% TSLA $399.81 -0.86% PLTR $184.11 -6.27% SOFI $16.76 -4.83% IBIT $43.35 -5.42% GLD $361.65 -3.59%