Zenta Group Company Limited (Class A) (ZTG) — RQD Stock Rating Cockpit

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ZTG scores 39 out of 100, grade D-, with the verdict "Roarable Sell — Vulnerable Balance Sheet & Flow." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 8 / 20. The rating cites ROIC of 0% and an FCF yield of -23.04%. For a prospective investor, this means the business is not currently generating returns on invested capital or positive free cash flow relative to its market value.
• Whale 13F Flow: 6 / 20. The rating characterizes institutional accumulation and options positioning as weak in this period. The holder-level detail needed to validate this is not available in source data.
• Insider Conviction: 7 / 20. The rating reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR flow at a low level of conviction. Specific transactions are not available in source data.
• Macro Regime Fit: 8 / 20. The rating cites a beta of 1.0 and sector sensitivity. This means the stock is expected to move broadly in line with the market, without a defensive cushion.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 10 / 20. The rating cites an Altman Z-Score of 2.5, a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, and Debt/Equity of 0.5. This is the highest-scoring pillar, but it is still below half credit.

Taken together, the pillars indicate that the valuation rests on earnings and cash-flow quality that the rating itself does not confirm. The trailing P/E of 15.9 and forward P/E of 13.4 look modest in isolation, yet the 0% ROIC and -23.04% FCF yield suggest that reported earnings are not converting into cash. A prospective investor weighing the stock today would be trading on a low nominal multiple against weak underlying cash generation, with a volatile price history (52-week range $0.55 to $12.25) adding further uncertainty.

Per the profile, Zenta Group Company Limited (Class A) is a NASDAQ-listed issuer classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector and the Professional Services industry. The profile reports a market capitalization of $0.0B, which conflicts with the $15.9M figure in market data. Not available in source data: product or service descriptions, customer base, and revenue model details. The financial figures indicate revenue has been reported across the three fiscal periods listed below.

Per the SEC financials, revenue grew from $0.9M in FY 2023 to $3.2M in FY 2025, while reported net income also rose. Operating income is shown as $0.0M in every period, and free cash flow was negative in FY 2025 at $-3.7M. Per the market data, gross margin and operating margin are both 0%, while net margin is 31.7%, a divergence that the source data does not explain. The Roarable RQD rating cites an Altman Z-Score of 2.5 and a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, and reports Debt/Equity of 0.5. Cash and debt balances are not available in source data.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Upstream and downstream dependencies cannot be identified from source data. The sector is listed as Consumer Discretionary and the industry as Professional Services, but no sector correlations are provided. Investors should watch for any future disclosure of customer concentration or supplier relationships, since the absence of mapped links means second-order effects cannot be assessed here.

• What explains the gap between the 31.7% net margin and the 0% gross and operating margins, given operating income of $0.0M in every period?
• What are the cash and debt balances, which are listed as N/A across all reported periods?
• Why does the profile list market capitalization as $0.0B when the market data reports $15.9M?
• What drove the FY 2025 free cash flow of $-3.7M despite positive reported net income?
• What business activities generate the reported revenue, given that the source data contains no product or customer description?