Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

$1.39 +4.83% NASDAQ β€’ Live Quote vs Prior Daily Close (Synced Snapshot) EXT / AFTER-HRS: $1.40

Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) carries a Roarable Rating of E (Strong Sell) with 21/100 RQD Confidence due to weak cash-flow efficiency and sensitivity to current interest rates. Wait for business cash flow and institutional buying to improve before committing fresh capital.

ROARABLE E β€’ RED ALERT Cap $4.3M
πŸ“€ Share Live RQD Speedometer Card: 𝕏 Post Reddit StockTwits ⬇ Live SVG Card
⚑ INSTANT AI QUANT PREVIEW β€’ $0 FREE TIER Click Any Pre-Computed AI Quant Specialist Briefing on WLDS Below β€” or Connect Your Own ChatGPT / Claude
πŸ€– Mara Quenwick β€’ AI Quant Lead (Click for Instant Brief) Is WLDS stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?
β–Ό

As of 2026-11-03, Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: WLDS) is rated E (Strong Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 21/100 at a spot price of $1.39 (+4.83% 1D, market cap $4.3M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 6/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, Executive Insider Alignment 3/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 3/20. Across 714 tracked Technology issuers, WLDS ranks #694 in composite RQD confidence.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Ellis Vennor β€’ AI Peer & Flow Quant (Click for Instant Brief) How does WLDS compare to CIIT and FOXX in the Technology sector?
β–Ό

Within the Technology sector (Computer Communications Equipment), WLDS carries a Roarable E (21/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of -22.9%, and ROIC of -35.0%. By comparison, CIIT (Tianci International Inc.) holds a E grade (31/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -35.0%, cap $1.6M) and FOXX (Foxx Development Holdings Inc.) posts a E grade (23/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -35.0%, cap $12.9M). Among the 5-stock peer group, BOSC leads on earnings multiple (8.6x) while BOSC leads on capital efficiency (12.9% ROIC).

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– Gideon Ashmere β€’ AI SEC 10-K Forensics (Click for Instant Brief) What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for WLDS?
β–Ό

Per WLDS's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001887673), Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share generated $647.0K in revenue (+23.9% YoY), -$8.1M in net income, and -$6.6M in free cash flow against $20.0M in total assets and $0 in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.. Primary risk factors monitored: Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

βœ“ Pre-computed one-to-many AI Quant brief
πŸ€– AI Quant Disclosure: Roarable Analysts are proprietary AI Quant Specialists β€” not human financial advisors. Pre-computed one-to-many briefings above are free; interactive 1-on-1 Q&A, custom AI sifting/indicator alerts, and personal ChatGPT/Claude MCP connections require a $9.95/mo Pro account (currently waitlist-only).
INTERACTIVE SCENARIO DECK:
πŸ›‘οΈ Portfolio Crash X-Ray
EXT / AFTER-HRS: $1.40 (+0.68%)🧬 Dilution Drag (+1.28% YoY Shares)βš™οΈ Cash Engine: 6/20 (E) β€’ 0% FCF Margin
Verify 90D Bucket Audit β†’
πŸ“Š Historical Track Record Warning: Scores below 50 (21/100 Β· E) historically underperformed SPY in 71% of rolling 90-day windows (-11.6% avg 90D alpha vs SPY β€’ 29.0% hit rate).
Audit Bucket Track Record β†’
RQD QUANT TACHOMETERRED ALERT β€’ E
025507510021
3-of-3 JEV AI Jury Bearish Warning
Cash
SEC
Whale

Impersonal quantitative research (0–100 RQD rubric) β€” not individualized investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Full Disclaimer

5-PILLAR SNOWFLAKE RADARRw E Β· Rk E
Cash (6)Whales (3)SEC (3)Macro (7)CEO (3)
Each axis scored 0–20
12M PRICE TARGET CONE-16.5% Base Target
$27 Bull$1 Base$1 Bear
πŸ“¬ FREE WLDS RATING-CHANGE & BRIEFING ALERTSManage / Unsubscribe
WHALE OPTIONS SNAPSHOT: β€” (No Active Options Snapshot on file for WLDS)Realized 20D OHLCV Swing Band: Β±12.5%
Deterministic 5-Pillar Attribution (21/100 Composite)
πŸ” WHY WLDS SCORES 21/100 (E) β€” TOP 3 DRIVERS2 Bullish Pillars + #1 Risk Drag
β–² #1 Bullish Driver: Macro Regime Fit+7/20 pts (33% of score)

FRED Regime Γ— Technicals: 2% of 52W Range β€’ RSI-14 at 44.6 (NEUTRAL RANGE)

β–² #2 Bullish Driver: Cash Engine Quality+6/20 pts (29% of score)

SEC XBRL FY 2025 (10-K): 0% FCF Margin ($0 FCF) & 0% Gross Margin

β–Ό #1 Drag / Risk Factor: Insider Conviction & Share Dilution4/20 pts (-16 pt drag)

Dilution Drag (+1.28% YoY Shares) & executive Form 4 sales trim 16 pts from alignment

πŸ“ˆ PAST 4 QUARTERS RQD vs SUBSEQUENT RETURNQ1 β†’ Q2 β†’ Q3 β†’ Current
Q1 (-3Q)
29
Grade E$1.42-3.5% Next Q
Q2 (-2Q)
26
Grade E$1.37-2.9% Next Q
Q3 (-1Q)
24
Grade E$1.33+4.5% Next Q
Current
21
Grade E$1.39-11.6% Hist 90D Ξ±
Trajectory: E (29) β†’ E (21)Full Audit β†’
βš”οΈ ADVERSARIAL OPPOSING CASE & FORENSIC KILL-SWITCH (WHY THE BULL/BEAR THESIS COULD FAIL)CONTRARIAN TURNAROUND & SHORT-SQUEEZE DOSSIER

βš”οΈ Adversarial Opposing Case: What Could Spark a WLDS Turnaround Squeeze

Gideon Ashmere Forensic Desk β†’

While WLDS currently carries a cautious 21/100 (E) rating due to Insider Conviction & Share Dilution (4/20), shorts face asymmetric squeeze risk if free cash flow inflects or management executes accretive buybacks.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #1

Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #2

Options & Short-Covering Gamma: Reclaiming the 50-day SMA ($1.57) and Max Pain ($1.46) forces dealer call-delta covering toward $27.22.

πŸš€ Contrarian Squeeze Trigger #3

Forensic Repair Trigger: Halting share dilution (Dilution Drag (+1.28% YoY Shares)) or retiring high-cost debt immediately upgrades the SEC 10-K Forensic pillar.

🎲 LIVE PREDICTION MARKET ODDS TIED TO $WLDSβ€’ $4.8M Crowd Pool β€’ Kalshi / Polymarket Composite
Contract: β€œWLDS Beats Next Quarterly Revenue & EPS Consensus + Hyperscaler AI CapEx Holds Record Pace”
SEC FORM 4 Γ— 13F HEDGE FUNDS Γ— CONGRESSIONAL STOCK ACT

WLDS Smart-Money Thermometer: NET EXECUTIVE TRIMMING / PROFIT-TAKING

Explore All 13F & Congress Whales β†’
β–² Disclosed Buys: 0 ($0)β–Ό Disclosed Sales: 0 ($0)

Wide-Open SEC Form 4, 13F & Congressional Disclosure Ledger (WLDS)

No recent open-market Form 4 cluster sales or emergency dumps flagged on WLDS. Visit the Global 13F & Congressional Whale Ledger for cross-market smart-money filings.

ON-DEMAND RQD QUANT WORKSHOP β€’ SPONSORED / PARTNER SPOTLIGHTHosted by Perry Belcher & Roarable Forensic Quant Desk

Red-Light Warning Desk: Spotting SEC Cash-Flow & Dilution Risks Before Downgrades (Featuring WLDS)

  • βœ“Walkthrough of WLDS's RQD Radar, SEC cash-conversion gap & downside invalidation levels
  • βœ“3 asymmetric Bear/Hedge frameworks when 10-year Treasury yields stay elevated
  • βœ“Includes nightly RQD rating-change & forensic signal email alerts on your tracked stocks
RQD INSIDER CLUB WAITLIST$49/YR PLANNED
Want Custom AI PineScript / Python Indicators & Priority Rating-Change Alerts?
WLDS // CANDLESTICK & AUTO-TRENDLINE WORKSTATION6M: -57.88%β–² RESISTANCE BREAKOUT
2026-11-03O $1.26H $1.39L $1.26C $1.39VOL 12.7K
RES: $1.23SUP: $1.12SMA50: $1.57SMA200: $3.51
$16.93$12.66$8.38$4.10$-0.18RES $1.23SUP $1.12$1.392026-05-042026-06-172026-08-042026-09-182026-11-03
PRIMARY-SOURCE FORENSICS, SECOND-ORDER LINKS & AI ANALYST DESK

WLDS Dilution Monitor, Expectations Hurdle, Butterfly Connections & Policy Exposure

Share Count & Dilution Monitor (#25)

Multi-year comparable XBRL diluted share count not disclosed (ETF or recent listing).

Reverse-DCF Expectations Hurdle (#30)
8.0%/yr Implied 5Y Growth

vs. +23.9% actual YoY revenue growth (assuming 9.25% cost of equity & 16.5x terminal multiple).

Ellis Vennor Setup Ledger (#33)

No active Ellis Vennor swing setup published on WLDS today. View full Setup Ledger β†’

πŸ¦‹ Documented & Second-Order Butterfly Connections Open Graph β†’

No direct multi-tier Butterfly edges indexed yet for WLDS. Explore sector supply chains on /butterfly.

AI Analyst Theses, Washington Policy & Company Video
🎬 No recent verified company-specific video clip queued for WLDS today (we never pad ticker pages with unrelated generic clips). Browse Macro Video Desk β†’
DETERMINISTIC MULTI-FACTOR EQUITY AUDIT β€’ SEC EDGAR XBRL Γ— RQD PEER BENCHMARK

πŸ“Š Quantitative Sector Peer Comparison, SEC Filing Delta & Investment FAQ (WLDS)

1. Head-to-Head Technology Peer Comparison (WLDS vs. CIIT, FOXX, INTZ, BOSC)

Industry: Computer Communications Equipment (14 Tracked Issuers)

Across 714 tracked Technology securities in the Roarable RQD universe, Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) ranks #694 by composite RQD confidence (21/100, grade E) and #678 by equity capitalization ($4.3M). Within this direct 5-issuer industry benchmark cohort, BOSC leads on earnings valuation at 8.6x trailing P/E, while BOSC leads on capital efficiency and profitability with 12.9% ROIC and 23.9% gross margin. BOSC currently holds the highest overall quantitative score in the immediate peer group at 62/100 (C) compared with WLDS at 21/100 (E).

Ticker / Company Roarable Grade RQD Score Trailing P/E Gross Margin ROIC 1D Change Market Cap Head-to-Head
WLDS ACTIVE
Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share
E 21/100 β€” -22.9% -35.0% +4.83% $4.3M Benchmark Subject
CIIT
Tianci International Inc.
E 31/100 β€” 4.8% -35.0% +2.94% $1.6M /ciit-vs-wlds β†’
FOXX
Foxx Development Holdings Inc.
E 23/100 β€” 7.2% -35.0% +2.75% $12.9M /foxx-vs-wlds β†’
INTZ
Intrusion Inc.
E 31/100 β€” 76.7% -35.0% -3.62% $14.3M /intz-vs-wlds β†’
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions
C 62/100 8.6x 23.9% 12.9% -0.47% $29.8M /bosc-vs-wlds β†’

2. Multi-Year SEC XBRL Revenue, Cash Flow & Balance-Sheet Trajectory (FY2023–FY2025)

SEC EDGAR 10-K β€’ FILED 2025-12-31 β€’ CIK 0001887673

In its most recent audited fiscal period (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31), Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) reported GAAP revenue of $647.0K (+23.9% vs. FY2024 revenue of $522.0K , and +689.0% cumulative change since FY2023) , GAAP net income of -$8.1M, operating cash flow of -$6.6M, and free cash flow of -$6.6M (+13.6% YoY). On the balance sheet, WLDS closed FY2025 with $20.0M in total assets against $0 in total debt (Altman Z-Score: 1.45, Piotroski F-Score: 3/9).

Fiscal Period Filing Date Revenue Net Income Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow Total Assets Total Debt
FY2025 (FY) 2025-12-31 $647.0K -$8.1M -$6.6M -$6.6M $20.0M β€”
FY2024 (FY) 2024-12-31 $522.0K -$7.9M -$7.6M -$7.7M $6.0M β€”
FY2023 (FY) 2023-12-31 $82.0K -$7.8M -$8.4M -$8.4M β€” β€”

3. WLDS Data-Verified Investor FAQ (RQD Rating, Sector Peers, SEC Forensics & Technicals)

βœ“ SCHEMA.ORG FAQPAGE JSON-LD ENABLED

Is WLDS stock a Buy, Hold, or Sell right now according to Roarable's RQD model?

As of 2026-11-03, Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (NASDAQ: WLDS) is rated E (Strong Sell / SELL) by Roarable's 5-pillar RQD engine with a composite confidence score of 21/100 at a spot price of $1.39 (+4.83% 1D, market cap $4.3M). Pillar breakdown: Fundamental Cash Engine 6/20, Institutional 13F & Options Flow 3/20, Executive Insider Alignment 3/20, FRED Macro Regime Fit 7/20, and SEC Balance-Sheet Forensics 3/20. Across 714 tracked Technology issuers, WLDS ranks #694 in composite RQD confidence.

How does WLDS compare to CIIT and FOXX in the Technology sector?

Within the Technology sector (Computer Communications Equipment), WLDS carries a Roarable E (21/100 RQD), trailing P/E of N/A, gross margin of -22.9%, and ROIC of -35.0%. By comparison, CIIT (Tianci International Inc.) holds a E grade (31/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -35.0%, cap $1.6M) and FOXX (Foxx Development Holdings Inc.) posts a E grade (23/100 RQD, P/E N/A, ROIC -35.0%, cap $12.9M). Among the 5-stock peer group, BOSC leads on earnings multiple (8.6x) while BOSC leads on capital efficiency (12.9% ROIC).

What are the biggest fundamental strengths and SEC risk factors for WLDS?

Per WLDS's SEC EDGAR XBRL 10-K filing (FY2025, filed 2025-12-31, CIK 0001887673), Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share generated $647.0K in revenue (+23.9% YoY), -$8.1M in net income, and -$6.6M in free cash flow against $20.0M in total assets and $0 in total debt. Key quantitative strengths: Established market leader in Technology with deep daily trading liquidity.. Primary risk factors monitored: Company executives have done more routine share selling than personal cash buying lately.. Institutional options positioning shows a 50% call / 50% put premium split.

Where is WLDS trading relative to its 50-day, 200-day, and 52-week technical levels?

WLDS last traded at $1.39 (+4.83% on volume of 105,551 shares), positioning the stock -11.46% below its 50-day simple moving average ($1.57) and -60.40% below its 200-day simple moving average ($3.51). Across its 52-week range of $1.15 to $25.92, WLDS sits at the 1.0% percentile with a 14-day RSI of 44.6 (NEUTRAL RANGE) and an implied next-earnings move of Β±12.5% ($1.22 to $1.56).

ROARABLE RATING BRIEF β€’ RQD 21/100 (E) βœ“ STAGE-C NUMBER FIREWALL VERIFIED

WLDS β€” Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share: What the Facts Mean to a Prospective Investor

Engine: anthropic/claude-haiku-5.5
As of: 2026-11-02T15:53:40Z

1. Roarable Rating Brief: What This Means to a Prospective Investor

WLDS carries an RQD Score of 21 out of 100, a letter grade of E, and the verdict label "Roarable Strong Sell β€” Forensic Risk / Avoid." Across the five pillars, the fundamental cash engine scores 6 / 20 (ROIC -35%; FCF yield 0%), indicating the business is not currently generating returns on invested capital or free cash flow to support value. The whale 13F flow pillar scores 3 / 20 and the insider conviction pillar scores 3 / 20, meaning the source data reflects weak institutional and insider support signals. The macro regime fit pillar scores 7 / 20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), implying the stock's market sensitivity is not offset by a favorable regime fit. The forensic balance sheet pillar scores 2 / 20 (Altman Z 1.45; Piotroski F 3/9; Debt/Equity 0.5), which is the weakest pillar and the most direct source of the forensic-risk label. For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the upside drivers visible in the source data are limited: the rating's components point to operating losses, negative returns on capital, and a weak forensic profile. The rating itself is a risk screen, not a recommendation to any individual.

2. Business Model, Unit Margins & SEC Financial Trajectory

Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) is a NASDAQ-listed issuer classified in the Technology sector and the Computer Communications Equipment industry,. FY 2025 revenue was $0.6M, indicating a very small revenue base.

The company reported operating and net losses in each listed period, with free cash flow negative throughout. Per the market data, operating margin is -60%, net margin is -60%, gross margin is -22.9%, and ROIC is -35%. The Altman Z-Score is 1.45, the Piotroski F-Score is 3/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. Cash rose from $3.1M to $6.5M across the two periods where cash is reported.

3. Institutional Bull vs. Bear Thesis & Valuation Tradeoff

  • πŸ‚ Primary Bull Case: Cash rose from $3.1M to $6.5M across the reported periods, the only positive balance-sheet trend visible in source data. With Fundamental Cash Engine at 6/20 (ROIC -35.0%, FCF yield β€”) and Institutional Whale Flow at 3/20, sustained execution supports upside toward the top of the $1.15 – $25.92 52-week range.
  • 🐻 Primary Bear Case: Operating losses of -$8.3M against $0.6M revenue, with ROIC at -35% and the forensic balance sheet pillar scoring 2 / 20. Investors must weigh current valuation against -60.0% operating margins and a 1.00 macro beta if sector demand softens.

4. 2nd-Order Butterfly Ripples & Key Questions to Watch

Sector is Technology and industry is Computer Communications Equipment. No upstream or downstream dependencies or sector correlations are provided in source data.

  • Key Question #1: What products or services generate the $0.6M of FY 2025 revenue, and who are the customers?
  • Key Question #2: What drove the decline from a $25.92 52-week high to the current $1.26 price, and is there any news explaining it?
  • Key Question #3: What is the company's debt position, since debt is listed as N/A in every reported period?

WLDS Live News Feed, Press Releases & Catalyst Wire

Real-time company headlines, analyst actions, and sector developments for Wearable Devices Ltd. Ordinary Share (WLDS) β€’ Click "Debate This Headline" to argue it in the Roar Pit below

πŸ’¬ Jump to WLDS Debate Forum (3) ↓
πŸ”₯ THE ROAR PIT β€’ LIVE COMMUNITY DEBATE 3 Active Posts & Replies

WLDS Bull vs. Bear Conversation Board β€” What's Your Call at $1.39?

πŸ‚ 67% BULLISH CONVICTION COMMUNITY TUG-OF-WAR ON WLDS 🐻 33% BEARISH CONVICTION
1. Pick Your Side on WLDS:
πŸ’‘ Tip: Back up your call with a price target or RQD metric to get upvoted to the top.
CA CashFlowKing FCF Compounder Hunter πŸ‚ BULLISH 🎯 Target: $1.70 (+27.8%)
πŸ“Œ Pinned Debate

WLDS (E β€’ RQD 21/100) operating leverage in Computer Communications Equipment is mispriced at $1.33

Picked up a starter position in WLDS in my $100K Virtual Cash book at $1.33. WLDS (E β€’ RQD 21/100) operating leverage in Computer Communications Equipment is mispriced at $1.33. Trading inside a $1.15–$25.92 52-week range with 0.0% FCF yield gives solid downside support if Computer Communications Equipment multiples expand this quarter.

VolSurface_Trader πŸ‚ BULL

@CreditSpread_Watch Shorting a 3/20 institutional whale-flow stock at $1.33 is dangerous when funds are rotating into Technology.

CR CreditSpread_Watch Balance Sheet Analyst 🐻 BEARISH 🎯 Target: $1.06 (-20.3%)
Spot @ $1.33

Operating losses of -$8.3M against $0.6M revenue, with ROIC at -35% and the forensic balance sheet pillar scoring 2 / 20.

Operating losses of -$8.3M against $0.6M revenue, with ROIC at -35% and the forensic balance sheet pillar scoring 2 / 20.. Look at the math on WLDS: paying current EV/EBITDA multiples for -35.0% ROIC and -60.0% operating margins leaves zero margin of safety if Computer Communications Equipment demand softens. I'd wait for a retest of $1.17 before getting long.

LIVE TAPE SPY $752.10 -1.80% QQQ $681.09 -3.60% DIA $519.34 -1.08% IWM $279.14 -1.68% NVDA $202.06 -1.26% AAPL $338.32 -1.83% MSFT $507.12 -2.83% TSLA $403.82 +1.00% PLTR $178.34 -3.13% SOFI $16.60 -0.95% IBIT $43.35 -5.42% GLD $361.65 -3.59%