Why LIVE Stock dropped -2.86% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash

Per the Roarable RQD rating, LIVE scores 46 out of 100, graded D, with the verdict "Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 10/20 (ROIC 12.1%; FCF yield 0%), Whale 13F Flow at 5/20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning), Insider Conviction at 11/20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow), Macro Regime Fit at 8/20 (Beta 1.0; sector sensitivity), and Forensic Balance Sheet at 12/20 (Altman Z 1.63; Piotroski F 7/9; Debt/Equity 0.5).

For a prospective investor, the pillar profile points to weakness rather than a single broken area. The weakest pillar is Whale 13F Flow at 5/20, indicating little institutional support in the source data. The Fundamental Cash Engine pillar at 10/20 pairs a 12.1% ROIC with a 0% FCF yield, meaning the reported return on capital is not translating into free cash flow yield at the current price. The Forensic Balance Sheet pillar at 12/20 is the strongest, supported by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.5, though the Altman Z-Score of 1.63 remains a relevant caution. Upside drivers would need to come from improved cash conversion and institutional interest, both of which the source data does not show as established. Valuation tradeoffs are difficult to assess because P/E and EV/EBITDA are unavailable in the source data. Macro sensitivity is moderate, with a Beta of 1.0 and a Macro Regime Fit score of 8/20. This brief is educational and not personalized financial advice.

Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is listed on NASDAQ and classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector and Other Specialty Stores industry, per the profile. The source data does not describe specific products, customers, or revenue model beyond the sector classification. Gross margin is 32.7%, operating margin 3.3%, and net margin 5.1%, per market data. Market capitalization is listed at $23.1M.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $472.8M in FY 2024 to $444.9M in FY 2025, while net income moved from $-26.7M to $22.7M. Operating margin of 3.3% and net margin of 5.1% are reported in market data. ROIC is 12.1% per market data, and the Altman Z-Score is 1.63 and Piotroski F-Score is 7/9 per the Roarable RQD rating. Debt/Equity is 0.5 per the same source. Cash and debt balances are N/A in the financials table.

Per the recent news feed, four items reference LIVE: a TradingView estimates report, a Zacks initiation of coverage with a Neutral recommendation, a TradingView stock price and chart report, and a Stock Traders Daily article on risk allocation. The Zacks item is the only one with a specific recommendation, which is Neutral. The Stock Traders Daily item is flagged with a RED light and RISK WATCH label; the other three are flagged YELLOW with MARKET WIRE labels. The source data does not provide the substance of these reports beyond their headlines and generic summaries. No proprietary signals are recorded in the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, with no butterfly links and no proprietary signals. Upstream and downstream dependencies are therefore not available in source data. Sector correlations beyond the Consumer Discretionary classification are not available in source data. Second-order bottlenecks cannot be identified from the provided material.

• What are the company's reported cash and debt balances, since these are N/A across all financial periods?
• What is the drivers behind the swing from FY 2024 net loss of $-26.7M to FY 2025 net income of $22.7M, and is it recurring?
• What explains the 0% FCF yield alongside a $21.0M FY 2025 free cash flow figure relative to the $23.1M market capitalization?
• What are the specific products, customers, and business segments that generate the reported revenue?
• What is the basis for the Zacks Neutral recommendation, and who holds institutional or insider positions?