Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc. (LECO) Insider, 13F Hedge Fund & Politician Buy/Sell Thermometer

Per the Roarable RQD rating, LECO carries an RQD Score of 76 and a letter grade of B+, labeled "Roarable Buy — Very Good Cash & Smart-Money Inflow." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine (18 / 20): Per the RQD rating, this pillar reflects ROIC of 24.5% and an FCF yield of 3.06%. For an investor, the high return on invested capital is the primary upside driver, while the 3.06% FCF yield indicates the cash generated relative to the current market capitalization is modest, which is a valuation tradeoff.
• Whale 13F Flow (15 / 20): Per the RQD rating, institutional accumulation and options positioning are scored as moderately favorable. Source detail on specific holders is not available in source data.
• Insider Conviction (15 / 20): Per the RQD rating, SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow is scored moderately favorable. Specific transaction records are not available in source data.
• Macro Regime Fit (10 / 20): Per the RQD rating, this is the weakest pillar, reflecting a Beta of 0.89 and sector sensitivity. A beta below 1.0 implies lower historical sensitivity to broad market moves, which can cushion drawdowns, but the low score signals the rating does not view the regime backdrop as a strong tailwind.
• Forensic Balance Sheet (18 / 20): Per the RQD rating, this pillar reflects an Altman Z-Score of 7.61, a Piotroski F-Score of 9/9, and Debt/Equity of 0.78. These are strong readings that support balance-sheet resilience.

Taken together, the rating points to a business with strong capital efficiency and balance-sheet quality, with valuation and macro-sensitivity as the main reservations. This is an educational reading of the scores, not personalized advice.

Per the profile, Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc. is a NASDAQ-listed issuer in the Industrials sector, operating in the Industrial Machinery/Components industry. Not available in source data for product detail, customer segments, or revenue-mix breakdown. Per the market data, the company reports a gross margin of 36.2%, an operating margin of 17%, and a net margin of 12.3%.

Per the SEC financials, revenue rose from $4008.7M in FY 2024 to $4233.0M in FY 2025, while net income moved from $466.1M to $520.5M. Per the RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 7.61 and the Piotroski F-Score is 9/9. Debt was $1982.0M in FY 2023 and $1150.2M in FY 2025, and the per-share debt-to-equity ratio cited in the rating is 0.78.

Per the news feed, headlines are predominantly catalyst-tagged, including growth-stock framing, a Q3 earnings reaction, and an earnings-beat story. A Seeking Alpha item cites a "volume recovery" supporting an automation angle. Two items are tagged as market-wire rather than catalysts. Per the news feed, the Q3 headline includes the phrase "margin pressure persists," which is a risk watch item. Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is recorded as NONE, and no proprietary signals are listed.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, no upstream or downstream links and no proprietary signals are recorded. Not available in source data for upstream dependencies, downstream customers, or sector correlation estimates. Investors should note that the absence of mapped links means second-order ripple effects cannot be assessed from the provided data.

• Which specific institutional holders and insider transactions drive the Whale 13F and Insider Conviction pillar scores?
• What is the company's revenue mix by product line and end market, given the sector-level classification only?
• Why is FY 2023 cash recorded as N/A while other periods are reported, and what drove the drop in debt between FY 2023 and FY 2025?
• What is the source of the "margin pressure" risk noted in the Q3 headline, and how does it reconcile with the reported operating margin of 17%?
• How does the 3.06% FCF yield compare with the valuation implied by the 29.6 trailing P/E, and what drives the gap?