General Motors Company (GM) Revenue-to-Profit Sankey Flow & SEC XBRL Financials

Per the Roarable RQD rating, GM scores 57 out of 100, graded D+, with the verdict "Roarable Sell — Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The five pillars are: Fundamental Cash Engine at 10 / 20 (ROIC 1.7%; FCF yield 22%); Whale 13F Flow at 17 / 20 (institutional accumulation and options positioning); Insider Conviction at 12 / 20 (SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow); Macro Regime Fit at 8 / 20 (Beta 0.9; sector sensitivity); and Forensic Balance Sheet at 10 / 20 (Altman Z 1.15; Piotroski F 6/9; Debt/Equity 1.5). Taken together, the rating's weakest pillars sit in the fundamental and macro categories, while institutional flow is the strongest element. For a prospective investor, the main upside driver cited is the institutional positioning pillar, and the main valuation tradeoff is that the rating's cash-engine pillar is weak even though the reported FCF yield is 22%. The 22% FCF yield appears alongside a 1.7% ROIC and a 1.5 Debt/Equity ratio, so the investor implication is that cash generation metrics and return-on-capital metrics are pointing in different directions and should be weighed together. The Altman Z of 1.15 and Piotroski F of 6/9 indicate the balance sheet pillar is a meaningful drag on the score.

General Motors Company is a NYSE-listed issuer in the Consumer Discretionary sector and Auto Manufacturing industry, per the company profile. The profile identifies the company as an auto manufacturer with a market capitalization of $72.3B. Not available in source data: product lines, customer segments, and revenue mix detail beyond the sector and industry classification.

Per the SEC financials, revenue declined from $171606.0M in FY 2024 to $167971.0M in FY 2025, and operating income fell from $12784.0M to $2909.0M over the same period. The market data reports operating margin of 1.7%, net margin of 1.7%, and gross margin of 0%, with ROIC of 1.7%. The forensic inputs are an Altman Z-Score of 1.15 and a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, with Debt/Equity of 1.5. Debt rose from $44270.4M in FY 2023 to $98152.2M in FY 2025 per the financials, while reported cash was $20945.0M in FY 2025.

• Market wire (Yahoo Finance, 1h ago): Headline reports GM outpaced the stock market that day; impact flagged as market wire.
• Catalyst (Seeking Alpha, 3h ago): Headline states an upbeat quarter with disappointing guidance; flagged as a catalyst.
• Market wire (Yahoo Finance, 6h ago): Headline reports heavy investor search interest in GM.
• Market wire (Barchart.com, 9h ago): Headline reports GM shares skyrocketed.
• Market wire (Seeking Alpha, 12h ago): Headline asks how GM can get back on track.
• Catalyst (Yahoo Finance, 15h ago): Headline questions whether a low valuation can be sustained alongside earnings growth.

Risk watch items from the news wire center on the guidance disappointment and the open question of earnings sustainability. Proprietary signals: none listed.

Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph: one confirmed link is recorded. Tesla (TSLA) is a CONFIRMED_CUSTOMER relationship with GM under the theme "EVs, Autonomous Fleets, Lithium & Megapack Storage," with direction effect TAILWIND and evidence tier CONFIRMED_FILING. The mechanism summary states GM integrated its EV lineup onto the NACS / Supercharger network, monetizing Tesla charging infrastructure and zero-emission regulatory credits. The next catalyst is listed as the Tesla Form 10-Q Automotive Regulatory Credit Revenue and Services/Supercharging Gross Profit disclosure.

The butterfly graph records one upstream-to-GM dependency: Tesla as a source of charging network access and regulatory credits. The exposure is labeled undisclosed in percentage terms. The graph identifies a constraint: federal EPA tailpipe standard rollbacks or state ZEV waiver revocations could shrink the pure-margin regulatory credit sales pool, which the source cites at $2.7B+ annually at Tesla. A competing explanation is that Ionna multi-OEM charging buildouts and potential federal EV mandate relaxations reduce GM's structural dependence on Tesla charging and emissions credits. The 2nd-order watch item for an investor is therefore the regulatory environment for emissions credits, combined with the Tesla regulatory credit disclosure. Not available in source data: direct supplier, distributor, or sector-correlation links beyond this single relationship.

• The source reports a 22% FCF yield alongside an EPS of 3.3 and a reported FY 2025 FCF of $17564.0M; how the FCF figure reconciles to the FY 2025 net income of $2780.0M is not resolved in the data.
• The financials show EPS as N/A for all three periods; what the reported per-share earnings trajectory has been is not resolved.
• The FY 2023 cash balance is N/A; the trend in liquidity across the full period cannot be fully established.
• Analyst consensus, price targets, and holder detail are absent; how the Street views the stock is unknown.
• The exposure estimate for the Tesla link is undisclosed; the size of GM's dependence on the regulatory-credit channel cannot be quantified from the source.