BT Brands Inc. (BTBD) Revenue-to-Profit Sankey Flow & SEC XBRL Financials

Per the Roarable RQD rating, BTBD scores 49 out of 100, a letter grade of D, with the verdict "Roarable Sell — Underperform / Distribution Warning." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 11 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this reflects ROIC of -3.5% and an FCF yield of 0.99%. For a prospective investor, negative return on invested capital means the business is not currently generating returns above its capital base, and a sub-1% FCF yield offers little cash cushion relative to the share price.
• Whale 13F Flow: 13 / 20. The RQD rating describes this pillar as reflecting institutional accumulation and options positioning.
• Insider Conviction: 5 / 20. Per the RQD rating, this pillar reflects SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow. This is the lowest-scoring pillar, indicating weak insider conviction signals in the source data.
• Macro Regime Fit: 13 / 20. Per the RQD rating, beta is 1.0 with sector sensitivity noted. A beta of 1.0 means the stock is modeled to move in line with the broader market, offering no defensive dampening.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 7 / 20. Per the RQD rating, the Altman Z-Score is 2.58, the Piotroski F-Score is 6/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.3. The balance sheet metrics are moderate, not distressed, but do not offset the weak cash-generation profile.

Taken together, the RQD rating points to a company with thin operating economics, weak insider signals, and a valuation that the cash-flow data does not strongly support. Upside drivers would need to come from operational improvement or sentiment shifts; the rating's negative verdict frames the current distribution risk.

BT Brands Inc. (BTBD) is a NASDAQ-listed company classified in the Consumer Discretionary sector and the Restaurants industry. Per the profile, the company operates as a restaurant business.

The news wire contains six items, all tagged to BTBD, with the majority of headlines being generic market commentary rather than company-specific events. Notable items include a "Top U.S. Stock Gainers" listing tagged as a CATALYST, and a market report noting BTBD slipping 2.31% to $1.69, consistent with a near-mid-range trading position. Risk watch items include the sub-$2 price relative to a $1.03–$2.48 range and the negative operating and net margins. Several headlines reference other tickers (GTIM, SERV, BIVI) and carry unreliable source attribution, so they should not be treated as company-specific evidence.

The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph carries a LIQUIDITY_TAILWIND signal with a severity score of 94 and a BULLISH direction, labeled as a Macro Tailwind Score of 96/100. Per that graph, BTBD is assigned a 3.81x Net Liquidity beta with r = -0.25, and the True Net Liquidity Index is cited at $5,745.73B with a -0.64% 4-week rate of change. This signal is macro-driven and is not corroborated by company-specific fundamentals in the source data, which show negative returns on capital.

Per the Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph, the supply chain is listed as "NONE" and no butterfly links are provided. The sector is Consumer Discretionary and the industry is Restaurants. The liquidity-beta signal implies that BTBD's price may be sensitive to changes in net liquidity conditions, which is a 2nd-order macro channel rather than a supply-chain one. Investors should watch whether the liquidity tailwind persists relative to the company's weak cash generation, since macro support cannot by itself fix negative ROIC.

• What are the company's cash and cash-equivalent balances in each reported period, given that the cash field is N/A throughout the financials?
• What is the EPS (TTM) and forward earnings outlook, given that P/E, forward P/E, and EV/EBITDA are all unavailable?
• What drives the restaurant revenue decline from $14.8M to $13.5M, and is it tied to location count, same-store sales, or pricing?
• Who are the institutional holders and insiders, given that the holders section is empty?
• What is the composition of the FY 2023 debt figure, which is listed as N/A, and how does debt trend across the reported periods?