Why ALLT Stock dropped -2.91% Today — RQD Quant Desk Flash

Per the Roarable RQD rating, ALLT scores 57 out of 100, a letter grade of D+, with the verdict label "Roarable Sell — Weak Fundamentals / Trim." The five pillars are:

• Fundamental Cash Engine: 13 / 20. Per the RQD rating, ROIC is 3% and FCF yield is 3.54%. These are modest return figures. The FCF yield is the more constructive datapoint, since it indicates the business is generating some free cash relative to its market value, but the low ROIC shows limited efficiency in converting invested capital into returns.
• Whale 13F Flow: 12 / 20. The rating describes institutional accumulation and options positioning as a middling signal. The underlying 13F detail is not itemized in the source data.
• Insider Conviction: 11 / 20. Per the RQD rating, SEC Form 4 and Congressional PTR cluster flow is weak. The specific transactions are not itemized in the source data.
• Macro Regime Fit: 9 / 20. Per the RQD rating, beta is 1.0 and sector sensitivity is the weakest pillar. This implies the stock tracks broad market moves without a clear macro tailwind in the data provided.
• Forensic Balance Sheet: 12 / 20. Per the RQD rating, Altman Z is 2.5, Piotroski F is 8/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5. The Piotroski reading is strong, while the Altman Z sits in a range that warrants monitoring.

For a prospective investor evaluating the stock today, the rating suggests a company with improving operational footing (the FY 2025 swing to positive net income, per the SEC financials) but a valuation that is difficult to reconcile with its earnings base. The P/E of 118 (TTM) against EPS of 0.08 means the market is pricing substantial future growth or margin expansion. The upside case depends on sustained profitability improvement; the valuation tradeoff is that little margin for error is priced in. The RQD verdict of "Trim" reflects this asymmetry.

Allot Ltd. (ALLT) is a NASDAQ-listed company in the Technology sector, operating within the Computer Communications Equipment industry, per the profile. Per the SEC financials, FY 2025 revenue was $102.0M. The source data does not describe the company's specific products, customer segments, or revenue model beyond its sector and industry classification.

Per the market data, gross margin is 71.1%, operating margin 3.5%, and net margin 3.6%. Per the SEC financials, the company moved from an operating loss in FY 2023 and FY 2024 to a small operating profit in FY 2025, with revenue rising from $92.2M to $102.0M. Per the Roarable RQD rating, ROIC is 3%, Altman Z-Score is 2.5, Piotroski F-Score is 8/9, and Debt/Equity is 0.5, which together describe a balance sheet with reasonable quality signals but thin returns. FY 2025 cash of $17.1M is the latest reported cash balance in the source data.

The Butterfly Supply-Chain Graph lists no upstream or downstream dependencies, no butterfly links, and no proprietary signals. Sector classification is Technology / Computer Communications Equipment. Sector correlations and second-order bottlenecks are not available in source data. An investor should note that without mapped supplier or customer links, the source data cannot identify which external shocks would transmit to ALLT. The beta of 1.0 suggests general market sensitivity, but this is not a substitute for a mapped supply chain.

• What is the company's revenue mix by product and customer segment, and how much of FY 2025 growth came from recurring subscription versus one-time sales?
• What drove the swing from a $62.8M net loss in FY 2023 to a $3.7M profit in FY 2025, and is the improvement sustainable?
• What are the company's debt obligations, given that debt figures are N/A across all reported periods?
• What are the specific insider, institutional, and Congressional transactions underlying the RQD whale and insider pillar scores?
• What is the company's guidance for the Q3 2026 results due November 12, 2026, and how does it compare with the current P/E-implied growth expectations?